.
NWIP
The Nuclear Weapons Inheritance Project
.
NWIP Training in Queensland



.
Back
. .
.


.

FromOctober 29th-31st, Ruth Mitchell of the Australian IPPNW Affiliate MAPW organized a training session for Australian students interested in NWIP work.


Below you will find some impressions and photos


.

.

Following discussions at the MAPW National Conference in August between Daniele Viliunas, the Queensland Coordinator of MAPW and Regional Vice-President of IPPNW, Veevek Thankey and Dave Chessor, medical students at the University of Queensland, and myself, it was decided that I would travel to Queensland to conduct a NWIP training event for MAPW Queensland. In hindsight the preparation phase for this weekend would have benefited from more regular communication between the involved parties as final turn-out was lower than had been hoped.

The location, for which we are utterly grateful to Daniele, was a holiday house on North Stradbroke Island off the coast of Queensland. Daniele’s willingness to allow the world of NWIP to invade her family holiday and take everyone along for the ride was amazing, and her gracious hosting meant we not only learned lots but were restored by being there.

The program, over 2 1/2 days, was to work through the bulk of the NWIP training modules. Nothing like this has been done before with MAPW students. On the first day we worked through the Health and Security module followed on the 2nd day by the Disarmament Crash Course, and it was all tied together by a session on Dialogue Technique on the last day, which led into a discussion about the future involvement and roles of those present. As is customary with NWIP events, the flip chart paper and big fat pens were in constant use, and the occasional powerpoint presentation rounded things out.

My impressions of the training weekend were that above all, we must be flexible and adaptable in the project. This means making a greater effort to include students in other disciplines such as education and social sciences as we have much to learn from them. The small group we worked with were wonderful and gave so much of themselves to ensure that everyone learned something. Speaking personally I think areas for development are better timekeeping and increased sensitivity to the emotional impact of powerpoint images, particularly images of the devastation caused by nuclear weapons. Although it was exciting to be able to put the whole program together and present all of the material, it would be ideal to have more than one person facilitating the training. Now that we have a group of trained students, this will be possible next time. Throughout the training I was reminded of the many strengths of the NWIP – participants not only acquire and consolidate a great deal of knowledge, but also learn new skills for group work and are able to add new techniques to their toolboxes. And the equipping for disarmament activities is also equipping for peace work in the broadest sense. Furthermore, the training is an empowering process, in which control over material is passed on and shared collectively. I also have to stress how impressed I am with the training materials NWIP has developed for such events. I found them very easy to use and framed with just enough detail. I have been involved in the project for just over a year and this is the first time I have led training events by myself, but the task was made easy by the resources at my disposal.

The principal goal of the training event was to increase the number of MAPW students who are NWIP trained. This ensures we are ready to send people on NWIP delegations in the future, particularly to China next year, and also means we have students who can train other students locally. This goal was achieved and we will now be in a good position, finances providing, to increase Australia’s participation in the NWIP. Because of the transferability of the skills and knowledge, the follow on effects of this training event could be significant and impact several areas of MAPW work, not least because Daniele Viliunas also participated fully in the training, enhancing synergies between student and doctor activities.

Ruth Mitchell

.

.